Skip to main content
Close
Login Register
Search
  • About
    • What We Do
    • Who We Are
    • FAQs
  • Our Writing
    • Explainers
    • Essays
    • Letterbox
    • More
  • Podcasts
  • Our Events
  • Projects
    • Power In The Food Systems
    • Local-Global Scale Project
    • MEAT: The Four Futures Podcast
    • Fuel To Fork
    • Nature
    • Reckoning with Regeneration
    • SHIFT
    • Rethinking the Global Soy Dilemma
  • Resources
  • Opportunities
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Courses
    • Collaborations
    • Events
  • Newsletter
  • TABLE (EN)
Search
Back

Livestock

Image
Cows on pasture. Photo by Leon Ephraim via Unsplash.
Essay
Livestock’s carbon footprint & the importance of comparing greenhouse gases
This blog-post from Martin Persson at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden takes on the timely question of how one should measure the climate impacts of different greenhouse gases.  He begins by explaining what the two most common metrics - Global Warming Potential (GWP) and the Global Temperature change Potential (GTP) – actually measure.  He then moves on to focus specifically on beef and associated methane emissions. In light of the Paris Agreement’s target of limiting warming to 2oC he argues that the ‘right’ metric to choose needs to reflect the specific climate policy that the measurement is to serve.Martin Persson is an Associate Professor at Physical Resource Theory, Department of Energy & Environment at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden. In addition to metrics, his research focuses on global land use in relation to climate, biodiversity, and conservation policy. In a recent paper he and his colleagues show that the consumption and international trade of beef, soy, palm oil and timber products are dominant causes of deforestation in the tropics.
Read
Image
Photo credit: U.S. Department of Agriculture (Flickr, creative commons licence, Attribution 2.0 Generic)
Resource
Livestock donations to Zambian households yield higher income, improved diet
Poor households in developing countries are sometimes included in livestock programmes by humanitarian organisations whereby they are given a cow, a pair of oxen, or a herd of goats. This paper analyses the impacts on the food security of recipients in these kinds of programmes and finds that the effect is positive. 
Read
Image
Resource
Greenhouse gas mitigation from livestock sector revealed
This new paper published in Nature Climate Change, assesses the mitigation potentials achievable through improved livestock management practices and moderating meat consumption. It estimates that livestock-oriented measures could account for up to half of the mitigation potential of the global agricultural, forestry and land-use sectors but emphasises that the gap between technical potential and social and economic feasibility is likely to be large.
Read
Image
Resource
Do we Have the Tools to Choose Sustainable Meat? Blog-post by Olivier De Schutter, Hans Herren and Emile Frison:
In their two-part contribution to the Livestock debate on the website of Arc2020 (the agricultural and rural convention), the IPES representatives Olivier de Schutter, Hans Herren and Emile Frison discuss the environmental footprint of livestock, the need for livestock farming to be reintegrated into landscapes and the flaws in the current factory farming model; and they propose ways to address the challenges posed by industrial livestock systems.
Read
Image
Resource
The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (SoW-AnGR)
The second SoW-AnGR by the FAO reviews the developments that have been made in the area of using, developing and safeguarding the genetic resources (i.e. the diversity of breeds) of our mammalian and avian livestock since the first SoW-AnGR report was released in 2007.
Read
Resource
Limiting livestock production to pasture and by-products in a search for sustainable diets
Read
Image
Resource
New report on economics by Compassion in World Farming
This report by Compassion in World Farming highlights the so-called “negative externalities” associated with livestock-based food production – that is, costs to human health and the environment that are borne by society as a whole and which are not accounted for by the cost of producing the food or the price of consuming it.
Read
Image
Resource
Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation
This very useful paper focuses on Brazilian beef production in the Cerrado grasslands region of Brazil makes an important contribution to the on-going debate about the merits of different livestock production systems, and of different consumption patterns.
Read
Image
An open pasture against a mountain range. Photo by Claudia Rancourt via Unsplash.
Essay
If farm animals only graze pastures and eat by-products – livestock problem solved?
This piece offers a review of nuances and contingencies in the current livestock sustainability discourse.This post is written by FCRN collaborator Elin Röös. Elin is a postdoctoral researcher at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences working for the Future Agriculture initiative at the same university, which is a strategic multidisciplinary research platform that addresses the sustainable use of natural resources with emphasis on agricultural production and food systems. 
Read
  • VIEW MORE

Sign up for Fodder, our newsletter covering sustainable food news.

Sign up
  • Glossary
  • About
  • Our Writing
  • Podcasts
  • Resources

Social

YouTube Facebook Instagram

© Copyright 2025

A collaboration between: