This event was hosted by TABLE with support from the Food Standards Agency and the United Nations Foundation on 30 June 2025 and took the form of a panel discussion moderated by Tara Garnett (Director, TABLE) with:Rob Percival (Soil Association);Dr. Sarah Nájera Espinosa, Research Fellow (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine);Amy Williams, Senior Digital Communications Manager & Nutrition Lead (Good Food Institute).This webinar is the second in a three-part series. Watch Webinar 1 (Drivers, Investments, Trends & Regulations) or register for Webinar 3 (Environmental Dimensions of Alternative Proteins).

This event was hosted by TABLE with support from the Food Standards Agency and the United Nations Foundation on 24 June 2025 and took the form of a panel discussion moderated by Tara Garnett (Director, TABLE) with:Helen Breewood (Good Food Institute);Dr. Yadira Tejeda-Saldana, Director of Responsible Research & Innovation (New Harvest);Dr Thomas Vincent, Deputy Director, Innovation Policy (Food Standards Agency).This webinar is the first of a three-part series. Watch Webinar 2 (Health Dimensions of Alternative Proteins) or register for Webinar 3 (Environmental Dimensions of Alternative Proteins).

The game Who got the power is designed around the intervention of the following 5 main identified actors involved in the case of land use change in the Amazon region of Brazil: the Brazilian farmer, the Brazilian government, the rainforest, the beef export lobby and the international environmental policies. Developed to be used as a discussion tool based on the new scenarios of land use change, the game aims to highlight and present new pathways depending on the collective decisions and actions of the different influences the actors have during the game session on the common resources consisting of the rainforest, agricultural land and livelihood. The concept of the game focuses on the setting of medium-sized family farms engaged in agricultural production, including soy and livestock, in the vicinity of the Amazon rainforest. The main challenge for the players in the game is to figure out the impact of their decisions on the alteration of land use. As power relations are firstly randomly attributed and later redistributed throughout the game when certain thresholds are breached, depending on the resources, the actors will encounter different scenarios based on their influence in the decision making.

This book claims to help eaters navigate wide-ranging, confusing and contradictory advice over healthy and sustainable diets. It claims to minimize misuse of goodwill by providing scientifically untrained readers with the tools to make the best choices for themselves and the planet.  

This study by the European Alliance for Regenerative Agriculture says European Farmers can produce significantly more food for less in a transition to regenerative agriculture. It benchmarks 78 regenerative farms in 14 countries, and claims to be the largest regenerative agriculture study.

This report by the Good Food Institute, an alternative protein advocacy organisation, claims to be a practical and evidence-based resource for healthcare professionals, policymakers, researchers, NGOs, and patient organisations to unpack the evidence on how plant-based meat fits in the ultra-processed food debate. 

This briefing by the Food Foundation aims to support food system stakeholders in how to map out and implement pathways to reduce meat consumption, in light of government and private sector inaction. 

Researchers identified a gene strain in rice that can maintain grain quality and yield in high temperatures, potentially a crucial development for producers in regions where climate change is causing extreme heat. 

This study examines how market dynamics affect the production and consumption of healthy and equitable diets in North America. It argues that isolated social or commercial interventions are ineffective to achieve equitable access to nutritious foods.