Skip to main content
OUR WRITING
Image
The misted glass of a vending machine. Photo by Fredrik Ohlander via Unsplash.
Explainer
Nature Knows Best? Naturalness in the Ultra-Processed Foods Debate
The idea that more natural food – food which hasn’t been transformed by human and industrial intervention – is best for us is a powerful one. Psychologists have found a strong preference for that which is “natural”, even when people differ in what they understand that term to mean. But naturalness is a muddle – we are often signalled by advertising to see heavily manufactured foods as “natural”; the pioneers of cereal manufacturing were the greatest advocates of “natural” food in the early 20th century; and it’s rare that crops, which have been manipulated by human breeding over millennia, are seen as “unnatural”.If naturalness is a slippery idea, though, it is still undeniably compelling. At the moment, nowhere is the preference for naturalness when it comes to the food we eat more prevalent than in concerns expressed over ultra-processed foods (UPFs). But does the idea that naturalness is inherently best set up a misleading dichotomy between nature and technology that doesn’t serve the interests of a more sustainable and equitable food future? Does a narrow focus on processing itself misplace bigger questions of power and agency on the one hand, and unhelpfully dismiss scientific techniques on the other? We explore these questions in our latest explainer, Nature Knows Best? Naturalness in the Ultra-Processed Foods Debate.https://www.doi.org/10.56661/f76228c7
Image
Photo of chickens in a large egg laying facility. Photo by Artem Beliaikin via Unsplash.
Essay
De-Naturalizing the Poultry Plant: the inevitable obscuring of industrial chicken
Martin Aucoin's De-Naturalizing the Poultry Plant is the winning essay from TABLE's 2024 Essay Challenge. The Challenge asked participants to consider the question, 'Should food systems be more natural?'Martin's essay reflects both on our understanding of the word 'natural' and on the deeply embedded but often invisible structures our food systems rely upon. Distilling questions from his own experience and research, he proposes the poultry plant as a natural consequence of a modern way to eat and feed. Martin Aucoin grew up in the rural Brazos Valley of Texas, never far away from people growing food: "Being surrounded by massive corn and soy fields, pecan orchards, and cattle and poultry operations, impressed upon me the vast scale at which modern agriculture operates. This made me feel disconnected from the food I ate – too small to even count. I felt this even more distinctly when I moved to the Dallas area for my undergraduate studies. The disjuncture between producer and consumer drove me to get involved in Dallas/Fort Worth local food movements and inspires my work to this day. Since then, I’ve worked as an environmental educator in Massachusetts, a Peace Corps Volunteer in The Gambia, and am currently finishing my graduate studies. My current life in Boston leaves little time or space for growing food other than a small garden, but I try to take as much pleasure as possible in cooking food and serving it to people. I dream of greater connectivity with the food I eat, the people who grow it, and the other species whose lives nourish humanity. I think many people share this dream, even if subconsciously; my work and writing explore this disjuncture and seek innovative pathways towards putting people back into relationship with their food."