The House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee has recently published a report on environmental labelling.  Key points as follows:
        - Labels can be an important influence on consumer behaviour
- There's a risk of having too many labels undermining consumer understanding and confidence.
- There's a need for universal labels backed by auditing and accreditation
- Government needs to put more resources into labels and set standards and perameters. The effectiveness of labels can be increased with use of fiscal measures
- Labels are only effective if there's information backing them up so consumers know what they're making choices about.
- There's a growing problem of greenwash - government should police this
- Labelling's real potential lies with its role in stimulating changes in business practice. Government should work with business and ensure labels are underpinned by proper systems for analysis, audit and accreditation.
- Carbon labelling is crucially important. Ideally the food industry and services sector should develop a credible and verifiable label but in practice - as in the case of food labelling, it may be that the best and clearest label allowing the easiest consumer choice has to be developed by a statutory agency and the Government will in due course have to consider the need to legislate for a sector-based universal labelling scheme. Indeed there is a strong argument for environmental and indeed ethical labelling to build on the lead given by the Food Standards Agency with their 'traffic light' approach and for government to expand this established and well-understood way of communicating with consumers into other areas. Above all, the Government should support clarity, simplicity and consistency in labelling.
 
    	
Comments (0)