Abstract

Within food systems transitions debates, various arguments are given for inclusive citizen participation in decision-making processes. This article critically discusses these arguments through an integrative literature study. We link scientific papers on transition studies, public participation, inclusivity, and food system research to discuss the need for and relevance of inclusive citizen participation in food systems transitions. The article distinguishes five arguments for the inclusion of citizens in decision-making processes: normative, substantive, legitimate, social learning, and empowerment arguments. These arguments are connected to various dynamics relevant to a transition process. This study shows that there is a fundamental tension between food systems transition thinking and inclusive participation. This tension plays out differently in different dynamics of food systems transitions. Therefore, we propose that the most meaningful form of inclusive citizen participation differs for each dynamic of food systems transitions.

Reference

Else Giesbers, Thomas J.M. Mattijssen, Cees Leeuwis, Citizen participation in food systems transitions: How inclusive should it be?, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Volume 56, 2025, 100986,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.100986.

Read more here. See also the TABLE explainer Tomorrow on the table: The politics and economics of food system transformation