Skip to main content
Close
Login Register
Search
  • About
    • What We Do
    • Who We Are
    • FAQs
  • Our Writing
    • Explainers
    • Essays
    • Letterbox
    • Reports & More
  • Podcasts
  • Our Events
  • Projects
    • Power In The Food Systems
    • Local-Global Scale Project
    • MEAT: The Four Futures Podcast
    • Fuel To Fork
    • Nature
    • Reckoning with Regeneration
    • SHIFT
    • Games at TABLE
    • Rethinking the Global Soy Dilemma
  • Resources
  • Opportunities
    • Jobs
    • Funding
    • Courses
    • Collaborations
    • Events
  • Newsletter
  • TABLE (EN)
Search
Back

Governance, policy, and power

Image
A photo of a cow standing by a pond by Luuk Steenbrink via Unsplash.
Essay
What can the Dublin Declaration teach us about credible scientific advocacy?
The Dublin Declaration is a pro-livestock statement that emerged from a Summit held in Ireland on the societal role of meat. While the Declaration has had influence in EU spaces, it has also attracted considerable criticism for its limited engagement with the climate, nature and social implications of the current livestock system, and for its authors’ apparent connections to the meat industry. Irina Herzon, who co-authored a response to the Declaration published in Nature Food in August, argues that, irrespective of those connections, the Declaration provides an example of a flawed scientific advocacy that should make us wary. Here, she sets out how selective evidence and unwarranted polarisation can compromise the integrity of academic engagement. 
Read
Image
Photo of a combine harvester in black and white. Credit Alex Rusin via pexels
Reports
How agriculture’s big five thrive in a food crisis
This report by the Green European Journal argues concentration in the agricultural commodity market has allowed a handful of companies to maximise profits during a global food crisis. It suggests European regulators should step up their efforts to rein in harmful market dominance. 
Read
Image
Picture of EU flag. Credit: Dusan Cvetanovic via pexels.
Journal articles
A qualitative analysis of policy narratives in the public consultation on the European Commission’s Farm to Fork Strategy
The paper performs a content analysis of 164 public responses to the consultation of the European Commission’s Farm-to-Fork Strategy and finds 12 distinct narratives, mostly focusing on agricultural production. Ten of them showed clear connections to three established agricultural policy discourses linking them to key stakeholders; farmer’s associations, NGO’s and industry representatives. 
Read
Image
Mosaic of different fields and land use
Think piece
Beyond a binary land use debate in Tom Heap's new book
TABLE interviews Tom Heap about his new book Land Smart in which he explores many difficult tensions and trade-offs in land use, from biofuels versus solar panels and regenerative farming to biotechnology, and tiptoes into the emotionally-laden debate of dietary change – revealing his penchant for pragmatism. 
Read
Image
Image: Tractors with protest signs in the street. Photo by stopthepave via flickr
News and resources
Farmers Protest, Who Gains?
A consortium of European media outlets investigate the power brokers of the burgeoning farmer protests in Europe and how they are turning the outrage to their advantage. They explore the key figures in France, Italy, Poland and Germany, who claim to represent the farmers and investigate whose interests they are really representing. 
Read
Image
Alt text: Cover of book: Food Deserts and Food Insecurity in the UK.
Books
Food Deserts and Food Insecurity in the UK
This book examines the social inequalities relating to food insecurity in the UK, as well as drawing parallels with the US. It introduces a new framework to examine the many influences on local-level food inequalities, whether they result from individual circumstances or where a person lives.
Read
Image
Photo by Mick Baker via Flickr. A sign of weetabix next to field
Essay
Deconstructing Weetabix: What my family farm's supply chain taught me about power
In this blog, Jack Thompson traces the supply chain of his family farm’s wheat to UK cereal manufacturer, Weetabix. In mapping every stage, he reveals where power is concentrated in arable farming: seed monopolies, fertiliser companies, machinery companies and grain merchants. He argues that this consolidation of agribusiness is driving not only environmental and social harm, but is a leading reason for the farmer protests in Europe. This article was originally published in Vittles, an online magazine based in the UK and India, publishing new food and culture writing. It was written by TABLE's research and communications officer, Jack Thompson. 
Read
Image
Image: Protester’s surrounding a pole holding Indian flags. Photo by Shakeb Tawheed via Pexels
News and resources
India farmers to continue protest march on New Delhi
Several recent news articles have detailed the resurgence of farmer protests in India - farmers are demanding guaranteed crop prices from the government. Al Jazeera has covered the demands of the protest movement previously. It has also covered the recent failed negotiations the movement has had with the Indian government. The protesters are now marching towards New Delhi to secure crop price guarantees to protect livelihoods but face blockades and tear gas from authorities
Read
Image
Image of someone holding a Palestinian flag in a burning field. Photo by hosnysalah via Pixabay
News and resources
Environmental and food systems impacts of war in Gaza
Several media outlets have reported on the substantial environmental impacts caused by the on-going conflict in Gaza including water and soil contamination, the health issues associated with sewage management problems and the greenhouse gas emissions associated with Israel’s military action in Gaza. These environmental impacts have implications for the short-term food production potential in the region and for the long term food security of Palestinians in Gaza.
Read
  • VIEW MORE

Sign up for Fodder, our monthly newsletter unpacking the future of food.

Tick below to opt-in to email communications.

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at info@tabledebates.org.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

  • Glossary
  • About
  • Our Writing
  • Podcasts
  • Resources

Social

YouTube Facebook Instagram

© Copyright 2025

A collaboration between: